Legs up

Reese Rideout enjoying himself.

Mashed

Is this Reese Rideout?

Reese Rideout and Paul Wagner

Reese Rideout and Paul Wagner.  (Of course, Reese Rideout is 'gay for pay')

Reese Rideout, Blake Riley & James Hawk

Eric Pryor & Reese Rideout

Reese Rideout, Blake Riley & James Hawk

James Hawk is the one on his knees, with the hawk tattoo on his shoulder, Blake Riley is on his back, and Reese Rideout is doing Blake Riley with his hand on Blake's junk.

Three handsome sexy blokes, of which at least one (Reese Rideout) is "gay for pay".

Reese Rideout and Blake Riley

Reese Rideout is the top, Blake Riley the bottom.

Athleticism

I'm pretty sure the top is Marcus Mojo, but not sure who the bottom is.

You can see more of the hot-as Marcus Mojo at my other blog, here and here.  He's gay for pay like Reese  Rideout, but that doesn't bother me.  He can come over (as it were) any time.

On the blanket

I think this might be Reese Rideout again.

Not sure who the other bloke is -- but he's obviously enjoying it.

Reese Rideout & James Hawk

A few posts ago, I posted a picture of two unknown (to me) blokes on a sofa.  A reader kindly pointed out that one was Reese Rideout, and after some research, I've concluded that the other is James Hawk.

He's a curiously handsome bloke, with his narrow, interesting face, his downward-sloping hazel eyes, and his long and kissable nose.

Here are some pics

It looks like the same sofa as in the previous post, doesn't it?

Reese Rideout is straight!

Say it ain't so!  But according to this frank interview with him and his wife, he is.

First a few pics ...

Reese Rideout is the top in every image.  And not only is he manifestly having no problem getting an erection, but in the last picture he is quite clearly also in ecstasy ( or is a consummate actor. In a manner of speaking.)  He says, in the article I linked to above:

Now I watch footage of women or think about Beckie while I'm filming.

O-o-o-o-kay ....  If you say so.

It's always been easier for lesbians to "pass" than for gay men.  Women are not expected to "perform", unlike the man.  Because the fact of the matter is that a man can't force a hard-on:  if at some deep level you're not turned on, you won't get hard.  A woman, by contrast, can always pretend to be aroused.  But Mr Rideout has no problem getting hard, as these images attest.  So at some level, he must find men a turn on, or at any rate, he must be turned on by the men he's filmed fucking.  Admittedly, they are kinda hot.  But still.

I don't care that he calls himself straight.  I know there are many men who do not define themselves as "gay" because they see it as a cultural definition rather than a clinical one.  Maybe it's time for a new label: straightish -- you call yourself straight but you can easily have sex with men.  Or perhaps straight but not strait or strict (all three words are of course cognate and have come into English via three different other languages)

The question I have for any Kinsey 6's reading this is whether you could get hard for sex with a woman.   And for any Kinsey 0's (why are you reading this blog, I ask myself ), could you get hard for a man?

Meanwhile, straight, strait, bi, gay or just gay-shaded, he has a magnificent body.